Healing of the man born blind occurred on a Sabbath (9:14). Sabbath observance was enforced to the extent that violating any regulation within its observance became cause for alarm. Other lawbreaking fell far down the priority list. The second scene of John 9 deals with an interrogation of the healed man by Pharisees, the harshest of Jesus’ opposition. Jesus does not speak in this scene, but His impression on this man is evident. Recounting the simple truth of what Jesus did for him is a prominent feature of this interrogation (9:13-17).
The man merely related the basics: “I was blind; He applied clay; I washed; I see” (9:15). This confused the Pharisees, while he remained calm and collected (9:16). Nevertheless, all of the interrogators agreed that Jesus was a “sinner,” a non-practicing Jew. The man countered that Jesus was a prophet (9:17). The Old Testament records instances of a prophet’s work being supported by a miracle. Second Kings 4 provides examples. The Pharisees, however, showed no interest in the miracle before them. They only sought to discredit the One who produced it by disparaging its recipient.
The man’s parents then experienced the intimidation side of human nature (9:18-23). Out of fear, his parents would only confirm the obvious (9:18-20). The Pharisees’ threats proved effective (9:21-23).
Things were different with their son. Simple truth from his experience with Jesus confounded the opposition and brought out their true character (9:24-34). Verses 24-25 show that truth needs no oath to affirm it. The Pharisees’ demanded an oath: “Give glory to God by telling the truth” (9:24, NLT), likely thinking he was lying earlier. Yet, his account remained consistent (9:25).
Consistent truth was powerful against their manipulation (9:26-34). He recognized their deceitful purpose. His question should be read in a mocking tone: “Surely you would not like to be his disciples, would you?” (9:26-27, NAU). They showed their true character by resorting to personal insult (9:28-29).
Intimidation had no effect on him (9:30-33). He who formerly had no physical sight possessed a remarkable degree of human insight. Just because something had never happened before did not mean God’s hands were tied now (9:32). His conclusion: “Only God can create sight. Jesus gave me sight. Therefore, Jesus was sent from God.” He left them confounded and reactionary (9:34). They had no place in their synagogue for this one who could see both physically and spiritually.
Dr. David Moore can be contacted at dm5867se@outlook.com
